Here’s an uncommon math phenomenon: the “Monty Hall Problem.”

Imagine you’re on a game show and there are three doors. Behind one door is a car, and behind the other two doors are goats. You choose a door, let’s say Door #1. Then, the host, who knows what’s behind each door, opens another door, revealing a goat (let’s say Door #3). Now, you’re given a choice: stick with your initial choice (Door #1) or switch to the remaining unopened door (Door #2). What should you do to maximize your chances of winning the car?

Intuitively, many people think it doesn’t matter whether you switch or stay. After all, you have a 1 in 2 chance, right? But the truth is that statistically, your chances are better if you switch doors.

Here’s why: When you initially picked a door, you had a 1 in 3 chance of choosing the car and a 2 in 3 chance of picking a goat. When the host opens a door to reveal a goat, that initial probability doesn’t change. If you switch doors, you’re effectively transferring your 2 in 3 chance of having picked a goat to the other unopened door.

In other words, by switching doors, your probability of winning the car becomes 2 in 3, while sticking with your initial choice remains at 1 in 3. This counterintuitive result has baffled many and sparked debates. It’s a great example of how our intuition about probability can sometimes lead us astray, and it’s a favorite puzzle among mathematicians and enthusiasts alike.